One of the main concerns of Sirius or XM subscribers about the proposed merger is the loss of music channels. Nobody wants to lose their favorite music channels. It was a concern that I voiced in this post, and many had the same feelings.
But in a recent interview with TWICE, Mel Karmazin has indicated that the loss of channels may not be as much as we fear it will be.
Here's a snippet from the interview:
TWICE: How would you accomplish your "one-radio, two-services" pledge? By porting some XM content to Sirius radios, and vice versa?
Karmazin: We started our service with 100 channels, and through compression technology and engineering enhancement and the normal rotation, we now have 135 channels instead of 100. So what we say is that we'd be able to increase our capacity by a certain number so that our existing receivers would be able to get some additional content. So as an example, if we wanted to have some baseball, or we wanted to have Oprah, or we wanted to have some of this content, we'd be able to deliver that to our satellites and to our receivers subject to the content partners' agreements. We couldn't offer a full complement of both services.
TWICE: Could we see a 50/50 split between XM and Sirius content on an existing satellite radio?
Karmazin: If we wanted to do that, but why would we want to do that if you're a Sirius subscriber and you like our content? We're basically saying to you that we don't want you to be disenfranchised. We saying to you that "You're an existing subscriber, you don't have to pay more than $12.95 after the merger, and your existing radio is going to work."
TWICE: And you would eliminate redundancies in the selection of channels offered by Sirius and XM after the merger to make room for some of the extra channels?
Karmazin: Let's assume for a second that, when the time came, that we'd take a look, and say that we both have a '50s station. Now can you sit there and say, "Which of the '50s channels might be the best channel?" And we'd have some cost savings at the head end, and we would not be producing two 50s channels.
TWICE: So Sirius would still have its voice and brand, and XM would have its voice and brand, a Sirius receiver would continue to get existing Sirius channels plus some additional XM content, and vice versa?
Karmazin: Right.
Now, of course Mel is leaving things open here, and being very careful with the words he chooses. And hey, that's understandable. But what I'm getting out of this is that the generic music channels - like a 50s, or Top 40, or Classic Rock channel - would be up for cost savings.
But those channels that have an individual "voice" would remain.
...at least, that's what I hope.
[CNN Money]