Jacoby remains "cautious" on (but doesn't dispute) latest Sirius-XM info
Friday, November 30, 2007 at 2:08 PM
Despite a report from Bear Stearns analyst Robert Peck, who predicts that a DOJ decision could arrive as soon as today or Monday, Bank of America analyst Jonathan Jacoby advises clients to remain "cautious" - deal or no deal.
Jacoby has remained as the devil's advocate throughout the merger proceedings, which is a good thing because it helps keep some of the more irrationally exuberant investors grounded (to a degree). Historically he's been very skeptical of the merger prospects (putting chances of approval roughly around ~30%). The interesting thing in his most recent research note, though, is that Jacoby does not dispute what Peck is reporting.
Much of the Bank of America analyst's conclusions have been based on information from DC contacts, but we don't hear about them in this note. Instead, Jacoby brings to light the high hurdles that XM-Sirius need to overcome to get approval (and there's no denying that this isn't your rubber-stamp kind of merger). If the deal is not approved, he points to significant downside. And even if the deal is approved, he feels there's not much upside.
"However, we are not ‘naïve.’ We think investors will most likely run these stocks post-merger approval," Jacoby notes.
To me, it's a significant development when the naysayers stop saying "nay."
Peck and Jacoby have been on two sides of the coin for this merger. With no significant information coming from BofA's sources disputing the information of Bear Stearns, well, I'd say that's pretty telling.
Despite a report from Bear Stearns analyst Robert Peck, who predicts that a DOJ decision could arrive as soon as today or Monday, Bank of America analyst Jonathan Jacoby advises clients to remain "cautious" - deal or no deal.
Jacoby has remained as the devil's advocate throughout the merger proceedings, which is a good thing because it helps keep some of the more irrationally exuberant investors grounded (to a degree). Historically he's been very skeptical of the merger prospects (putting chances of approval roughly around ~30%). The interesting thing in his most recent research note, though, is that Jacoby does not dispute what Peck is reporting.
Much of the Bank of America analyst's conclusions have been based on information from DC contacts, but we don't hear about them in this note. Instead, Jacoby brings to light the high hurdles that XM-Sirius need to overcome to get approval (and there's no denying that this isn't your rubber-stamp kind of merger). If the deal is not approved, he points to significant downside. And even if the deal is approved, he feels there's not much upside.
"However, we are not ‘naïve.’ We think investors will most likely run these stocks post-merger approval," Jacoby notes.
To me, it's a significant development when the naysayers stop saying "nay."
Peck and Jacoby have been on two sides of the coin for this merger. With no significant information coming from BofA's sources disputing the information of Bear Stearns, well, I'd say that's pretty telling.



XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. stockholders have voted to approve the merger with Sirius Satellite Radio Inc, at its special meeting of stockholders today.
Unsurprisingly, Sirius stockholders voted to approve the merger with XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc.
Sirius Satellite Radio Inc is turning up the volume in their call for shareholders to vote for the Sirius-XM merger. They've been broadcasting promotions on the air and I recently received this email blast that I'm sure most of you found in your inbox as well.
Yet another independent proxy advisory service -