Can the FCC impose indecency restrictions on Satellite Radio?
Friday, November 26, 2004 at 9:55 PM
In short? Yes, the FCC can. An article by the NAMCT highlights some interesting points that "some people" are trying to get the FCC to do just that.
Specifically, Saul Levine - the owner of KUSR-AM Beverly Hills, Calif.; KTIM-AM Piedmont, Calif.; and classical KMZT-FM Los Angeles - filed a Petition for Rulemaking to amend Part 25 of the FCC?s pending satellite radio rules to include an indecency provision. He also feels that satellite radio is subject to Title 18 of the U.S. Code, Section 1464, which prohibits broadcasting indecent material between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.
Why does Mr. Levine think he can get away with this? Well, according to his petition, the FCC already has subjected satellite radio to Equal Employment Opportunity and political broadcasting rules and policies. So why stop there? Since the FCC has already put satcasters on notice that it ?may adopt additional public-interest requirements at a later date?, we should just slap them with every restriction possible!
Now, the FCC technically does have the authority to apply the indecency statute to satellite. Because a piece of the spectrum that satellite operators currently broadcast over was granted - not paid for - which places it as part of public airwaves. Since that slice of spectrum is public, the FCC can attach indecency regulations to it. But there's a lot of doubt that the FCC will follow through with this craziness.
Levine eventually has a bit of penis envy as he stated, "When I heard him (Howard Stern) say he was going to destroy radio, that he was going to kill it, I decided I had to fight back to protect the radio industry. I have three stations and over a million listeners a week. . . If they can say dirty words, we want to be able to too." Not that he ever would, he adds. But, "everybody else in the radio industry is running around like scared sheep. I am not going to just sit back."
Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven eh?
In short? Yes, the FCC can. An article by the NAMCT highlights some interesting points that "some people" are trying to get the FCC to do just that.
Specifically, Saul Levine - the owner of KUSR-AM Beverly Hills, Calif.; KTIM-AM Piedmont, Calif.; and classical KMZT-FM Los Angeles - filed a Petition for Rulemaking to amend Part 25 of the FCC?s pending satellite radio rules to include an indecency provision. He also feels that satellite radio is subject to Title 18 of the U.S. Code, Section 1464, which prohibits broadcasting indecent material between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.
Why does Mr. Levine think he can get away with this? Well, according to his petition, the FCC already has subjected satellite radio to Equal Employment Opportunity and political broadcasting rules and policies. So why stop there? Since the FCC has already put satcasters on notice that it ?may adopt additional public-interest requirements at a later date?, we should just slap them with every restriction possible!
Now, the FCC technically does have the authority to apply the indecency statute to satellite. Because a piece of the spectrum that satellite operators currently broadcast over was granted - not paid for - which places it as part of public airwaves. Since that slice of spectrum is public, the FCC can attach indecency regulations to it. But there's a lot of doubt that the FCC will follow through with this craziness.
Levine eventually has a bit of penis envy as he stated, "When I heard him (Howard Stern) say he was going to destroy radio, that he was going to kill it, I decided I had to fight back to protect the radio industry. I have three stations and over a million listeners a week. . . If they can say dirty words, we want to be able to too." Not that he ever would, he adds. But, "everybody else in the radio industry is running around like scared sheep. I am not going to just sit back."
Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven eh?


