David vs Goliath: Using antitrust "concerns" to kill off competitors

Friday, March 9, 2007 at 4:56 PM
Tags:

Satellite vs TerrestrialThe Washington Examiner has a very interesting piece on the NAB is so gung-ho against the XM-Sirius merger. While NAB is crying that the merger would create an unfair competitor, the numbers just don't add up:

  • Sirius and XM have a combined annual revenue of $1.49 billion.
  • Clear Channel, the largest member of the NAB, raked in a whopping $1.97 billion in revenue... last quarter.
  • Sirius and XM have nearly 14 million subscribers combined.
  • Clear Channel boasts 110 million listeners.

So a single member of the NAB (an organization with a $20 million building in downtown DC and an $7 million annual lobbying budget) earns more money than the entire satellite radio industry combined, and nearly 10x as many listeners.

And yet, the NAB is saying that a merger would harm the "local" broadcast industry. (The term "local" is used to make them out to be "the little guy" - but we all know that terrestrial radio is far from "local" - *cough* voicetracking *cough*).

While the NAB is calling the merger a “a government bail-out to avoid competing in the marketplace,” The Examiner thinks it might be more accurate to say that the NAB is asking for government protection against competition.

[Washington Examiner via The Liberty Papers

TrackBack/Ping:

Post a comment

(or continue the conversation in the Orbitcast Forums)


Recent Entries

From the Forums...
Search Orbitcast:

Recent Readers
Latest Poll
Technology & Media Blogs
These are blogs that relate to technology, media or other specific industries, but not soley on satrad.
Sponsored Links





Copyright © 2008 Orbitcast Media, LLC.