This is a busy day for the investment analysts. This morning, Bear Stearns analyst Bob Peck issued a client note stating that a positive ruling from the CRB over music royalties is expected shortly.
"Our contacts in DC suggest that a positive ruling from the Copyright Royalty Board," wrote Peck.
Last month, the Copyright Royalty Board made a proposal for "preexisting subscriptions services" which I thought might give a glimpse into their line of thinking for the proceedings with Sirius and XM.
Bear Stearns is projecting the total aggregate amount for music royalties to be around 10%. That's about 7% of total revenues, and then an additional 3% in royalties for the other four industry associations, RIAA, ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC.
In August, it was disclosed in an SEC filing that Sirius and XM proposed a flat-fee rate of $1.20 for each performance made of a copyrighted sound recording. SoundExchange countered with their own per-performance rate, which conveniently works out to roughly the 8% to 23% over the rate period that they originally wanted.
The whole issue that, understandably, XM and Sirius have a problem with is that SoundExchange wants a piece of all the action. They want a percentage of total revenue, when music is only part of the entire satellite radio offering.
Peck suggests that "it is possible that music royalty rates may be calculated on a subset of subscriber revenues attributable to music, rather than total revenues." If that's the case and Sirius-XM are able to pull this off, then both Bear Stearns' - and the consensus - could have an overly conservative model.
Let's hope.




are you going? can you give summary of what is being said?
are you going? can you give summary of what is being said?
It's out Ryan. No surprise
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/071204/netu085.html?.v=35