USA Today has a write up on HD Radio today and of course pits HD against Satellite Radio in terms of sound quality, price and selection. Initially I was expecting another one of those ho-hum articles (*cough*) simply regurgitating iBiquity's media kit, but Edward C. Baig actually wrote a very nice and honest comparison. Wow.

His points are all very truthful and valid: HD Radio is still way too young to endorse or decline, HD units are pricey right now but you don't need to pay a monthly fee, Satellite Radio offers far more selection, and satrad is available nationwide.

And while I'm pretty much anti-anything when it comes to commercial radio, I really can't argue against this article. HD really is too young to compare it right now, and satellite radio really does offer more selection nationwide. The only thing I would point out is the headstart that satrad has against HD. Only now did the Radio industry start to get organized with this technology - Satellite Radio is already looking far into the future to bring much more than just "radio" to the table. Let's take a look in a few years and see where both industries are, and then let's do a true comparison, shall we?

[USA Today]