Kevin Martin says Fairness Doctrine not needed, cites satellite as a reason
The FCC has no intentions of bringing back the Fairness Doctrine, said FCC Chairman Kevin Martin. And he cited satellite radio as one of the reasons.
The Fairness Doctrine was first instituted in the late '40s, but was finally put to sleep in 1987 when it was determined the doctrine was not in the public interest.
Several Democratic lawmakers suggested that Congress take another look at the doctrine after conservative radio talk show hosts aggressively attacked an immigration reform bill when it was on the Senate floor, contributing to its defeat. Representative Mike Pence (R-IN) and other Republicans in both the House and Senate countered by introducing legislation to bar the FCC from reinstating the rule.
But Martin effectively squashed the issue in a letter to Pence that was made public today. The FCC Chairman said that the Commission has no intensions of revisiting the doctrine, and that government regulation wasn't needed to ensure public access to a wide range of opinion.
"Indeed, with the continued proliferation of additional sources of information and programming, including satellite broadcasting and the Internet, the need for the Fairness Doctrine has lessened even further since 1987," wrote Martin.
And THAT is pretty cool to see.
[Breitbart]
Thanks espnjason!


Comments
excellent!
Posted by: t-bone | July 26, 2007 11:46 PM
Very good to hear! It was odd how SatRad didn't come up in the discussion in Congress when they were so excited to bring back the Doctrine....
Posted by: Jordan | July 27, 2007 12:05 AM
No on was asking for the Fairness Doctrine to come back anyway. It was made a big deal by right wingers like Hannity, in response to a report showing that, SURPRISE, 91% of talk programming is conservative. However, contrary to moron Hannity's assertions, the report mentions nothing about bringing back the Fairness Doctrine.
Posted by: MikeDV | July 27, 2007 8:17 AM
No one sees that Kevin Martin has effectively lumped terrestrial, satellite and internet radio all together in that statement? If you are wondering how he's leaning in the merger, it's all right there!
Posted by: Anonymous Coward | July 27, 2007 10:44 AM
Anonymous Coward is correct (IMO). If the FCC is using the expanded market apporach to say there is enough competition in the media that is carried on the different mediums, then is by default saying that they compete and are viable substitutes for each other.
THe FCC just showed its hand. Thanks Kevin.
Posted by: cyclopsebunny ? | July 27, 2007 11:59 AM
Martin is smart and chooses his words very carefully. There's no way he would put "satellite and internet" in there without considering the implications.
and this was in a letter? wow, he even puts it in writing.
Posted by: xoxo | July 27, 2007 12:45 PM
The merger is a go.. no matter how much you may not want it...
Posted by: harry hardon | July 27, 2007 7:58 PM