More Sirius-XM merger support from Congress

Eleven members of Congress voiced their support for the Sirius-XM merger, in a letter addressed to FCC Chairman Kevin Martin.
The letter was signed by:
Rep. Sanford Bishop (D-GA), Rep. Corrine Brown (D-FL), Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Rep. Danny Davis (D-IL), Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), Rep. Ralph Hall (R-TX), Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Rep. Greg Meeks (D-NY), Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL), and Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-NY).
"...the merger of Sirius and XM will create new opportunities for this type of diverse programming that has been overlooked by terrestrial-radio broadcasters. This merger will allow the companies to offer even more diverse content by consolidating programming and better utilizing capacity to offer even more unique and diverse programming to currently underserved populations."
The timing of this is interesting.
The NAB came out with their own Congress-backing letter to the FCC many months ago. Meanwhile, Sirius-XM lately have seen momentum build on Capitol Hill with support from various lawmakers. Is this a calculated "killing blow" tactic? Or did it just take them this long to garner this level of support?
[Read the letter here (PDF)]

Comments
Can't help but wonder what caused these people to sign on to this nonsense.
Posted by: StackPointer | October 29, 2007 1:08 PM
On both sides.
What business is it of Congress anyways?
Posted by: banff21 | October 29, 2007 1:32 PM
Again, how can a consolidating programming from the two companies better serve the less served?
Let us not forget that Mel was the originator of the 20 minuites per hour of commercials and bought in to the canned play lists as well.
Going foward the merged company will have to prove the "Synergies" and they will have to have more Mass Apeal to draw more subscibers. The mass appeal will not serve the underserved.
And how in the world does this effect the marketplace? did the letter address the compitition?
When the Automobile was introduced ... Did horse breeders move to merge?
When FM was introduced did AM stations move to merge?
When the 8 track was replaced by the cassette, did Vynil and 8 track companies look to merge?
I do not like the NAB smear tackticks, but, I just do not see well founded support for a merger. I see ill guided support.
Posted by: jeff | October 29, 2007 1:45 PM
I wonder why 5 people from New York alone signed on to this. Looks too suspicious in my eyes
Posted by: Travis | October 29, 2007 2:37 PM
Aren't Democrats supposed to be ANTI-big business? These are the same guys that tried to bust Microsoft up, right? Pussies.
Posted by: Randy in Minnesota | October 29, 2007 3:35 PM
... Ryan, Will you auction the letter on eBay? lol
Posted by: espnjason | October 29, 2007 3:43 PM
Jeff:
When FM was introduced did AM stations move to merge?
When the 8 track was replaced by the cassette, did Vynil and 8 track companies look to merge?>>
Most pathetic arguments I have ever seen on this subject. They have nothing to do with the merits (or lack thereof) of the merger.
Posted by: Max | October 29, 2007 4:56 PM
"Aren't Democrats supposed to be ANTI-big business?"
You hit the NAIL ON THE HEAD Randy. Its about time people started to realize that Sirius XM which accounts for 4% of the radio listening in this country is going against the Behemoth that is terrestrial radio. Quite honestly terrestrial radio has monopolized radio listening most of our lives until the internet and satellite radio started.
Posted by: MUSCLE13 | October 29, 2007 6:20 PM
One way or the other its time to get this long process over with.....
It really should not take this long for 2 relatively small companies to merge already. Rupert Murdoch is buying out American newspapers, investment banking, and the Dow Jones while cranking out the political propaganda at Faux News as we wait and wait and wait for a satellite radio merger ...WTF
Posted by: Mrwirez | October 29, 2007 7:38 PM
Why would terrestrial radio fear a monopoly on a good such as satellite radio? Wouldn't increased pricing send more customers their way? Terrestrial radio is simply trying to insure the downfall of satellite radio through the bankruptcy of the Sirius and XM. This merger needs approved.
Posted by: Logical | March 12, 2008 10:48 AM
Suppose there are two online merchants both offering web hosting services on their sites. The first merchant offers a one- time commission type of affiliate program that pays 80 for every single affiliate initiated sale. The second merchant also offers an affiliate program, but this time a residual affiliate program that pays only 10 for every single affiliate initiated sale. As an affiliate, we may get attracted at once at what the first merchant is offering, as 80 is definitely a lot larger than 10. But by...
Posted by: make money online | April 18, 2008 8:28 AM