Satellite Radio Merger FAQ
XM Satellite Radio has issued several SEC filings in relation to the Sirius and XM merger.
Of them is a FAQ that very clearly outlines the proposed merger and it's implications. But since most of you are lazy clickers, here it is below:
Why a merger and why now? What is the strategic rationale for this transaction?
A merger of XM and Sirius will form the nation’s premier digital audio provider, creating a satellite radio company that will provide consumers across the country with more and better premium radio programming.
The merger is in the best interest of both shareholders and consumers. The combined company will be able to offer more value to consumers, while achieving significant synergies through cost efficiencies and technology-related benefits.
Satellite radio faces substantial competition from a broad variety of products and services. In addition to existing competition from free “over-the-air” AM and FM radio as well as iPods, Internet radio and cell phones, satellite radio will face new challenges from the growth of HD Radio and next generation wireless technologies. These factors have made a combination the best way to compete against the multitude of options available to consumers.
Is this a 50/50 merger?
Yes, this is a merger of equals.
Who will run the new company?
Gary Parsons will be the chairman of the combined company. Mel Karmazin will be the chief executive officer. Other positions will be decided upon in the coming months.
Where will the new company be headquartered?
The companies will work together to determine the location of its corporate headquarters prior to the closing of the transaction. The new company will have a significant presence in both Washington and New York City.
What will be the name of the new company?
Although we hope to close this transaction by the end of 2007, this process may well take as long as a full year. We will make a decision regarding the name of the new company as we get closer to closing.
What will the corporate governance structure be for the merged company?
The new company’s board of directors will consist of 12 directors, including Gary Parsons and Mel Karmazin, four independent members designated by each company, as well as one representative each from current XM board members GM and Honda.
How will the two companies bridge different cultures?
The two companies have a lot in common. The companies share the same spirit of entrepreneurship and excitement about innovation and are committed to providing the best content to their consumers and look forward to adopting the best aspects of each company into the combined company.
Can Sirius and XM succeed as stand-alone companies if the merger is not approved by regulators?
Yes. That said, we believe a merger is the preferred option for Sirius and XM, our shareholders and customers. The merged entity will be better able to manage its costs while driving innovation in this fast-moving competitive marketplace.
What is the timeframe for regulatory approval? Timeframe for integration?
We expect the transaction to be completed by the end of 2007. We will seek to integrate the companies and technology platforms as quickly as possible after regulatory approval, while supporting both Sirius and XM customers.
Is there a rule prohibiting the two satellite radio providers from merging?
No. No rule barring such a merger has been published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Satellite radio is subject to the same rules governing transfers of control as other FCC licensees when it licensed satellite radio service in 1997, the FCC was not asked to rule on whether a satellite radio merger would serve the public interest. In its original 1997 order, the FCC noted that it wanted two satellite radio providers because it thought the companies would compete primarily with each other. Thus, the FCC did offer its view, based on competitive conditions at the time, that combining the two existing satellite licenses would not serve the public interest. Since that time, the options for audio entertainment have expanded greatly and the FCC’s policy statement simply no longer reflects the reality of today’s audio marketplace. As former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt recently told the New York Times, “I think we did the right thing to begin with. You wouldn’t want to change it if it weren’t for the fact that it is so obvious that you can get content in so many different ways. That wasn’t really true then.”
When will the companies merge their operating platforms/networks?
No timeline has been set, however, we will seek to integrate the companies and technology platforms as quickly as possible, while supporting both Sirius and XM customers. We will be thoroughly evaluating all technology to ensure the best system for our customers is used going forward. Both companies are committed to ensuring the smoothest possible transition for customers who already have factory-installed satellite radio, and we do not anticipate any interruptions in service.
What will the merged programming lineup look like?
Once fully integrated, the new company plans to provide customers with access to a richer portfolio of diverse programming, including an enhanced lineup of commercial-free music channels.
In addition, a merger would ultimately allow the new company to free up bandwidth, which could be reallocated to enable exciting new services and expanded public interest programming, including more news and information. Additionally, bandwidth could be re-deployed to enrich underserved demographics and attract more diverse segments.
What does this mean for employees?
By driving stronger growth and being better positioned to compete against other entertainment platforms, a combined company will ultimately create opportunities for employees. While there will be some overlap in our businesses, we won’t begin integration of the businesses until this deal is closed. In the meantime, we will continue to operate independently.
As in all mergers, some positions in both companies are likely to be eliminated based on integration analysis. While it is too early in the process to speculate regarding any individual positions, we are taking steps to ensure that any employee whose position is eliminated as a result of the merger will receive appropriate separation benefits.
Again, it’s important to remember that the integration won’t begin until after regulatory approval and the deal is closed. In the meantime, everyone should focus on their job duties and our commitments to our subscribers, shareholders and partners.
Will I be asked to relocate?
We won’t be making any integration decisions, including decisions about potential job relocations, until later in the process – likely in 2008.
Will my job title or reporting responsibilities change?
There will be some overlap in our business that could, conceivably, necessitate job or title changes. However, we won’t be making any integration decisions until later in the process. For the time being, it’s business as usual and we will continue to operate independently until we receive regulatory approval.
Will my base pay, overtime or pay cycle change?
Pay and benefits that employees currently receive will not change for the time being. We can commit that pay and benefits packages will remain competitive.
I was expecting a bonus for my work in 2006. Will that change as a result of the merger?
No, we are planning to pay individual bonuses and award merit increases this year as we communicated to everyone who is bonus-eligible.
I’m used to receiving XM stock options/grants – will I continue to receive them?
The company anticipates following its normal annual practice by making a grant of stock/options in 2007.
Will there be changes to our health care benefits?
We are still in the early stages, and integration has not yet begun. We can commit that benefits packages will remain competitive.
I’m out on disability. Will my coverage be affected?
Disability coverage, as well as other pay and benefits that employees currently receive, will not change for the time being.


Comments
We will be thoroughly evaluating all technology to ensure the best system for our customers is used going forward. Both companies are committed to ensuring the smoothest possible transition for customers who already have factory-installed satellite radio, and we do not anticipate any interruptions in service.
I am really going to be interested in how they pull this off. I guess that shifting programming around isn't "interrupting service." To make effecient use of the bandwidth they will have to move stuff around. Hopefully upping the bitrate of channels in the process. I think some people will complain if their favorite channel moves to a frequency that their current radio cannot receive.
I hope they keep with the geo-stationary sats, and not go with the Sirius ones. I get much better reception on my XM radio than with Sirius in Los Angeles.
The biggest winners are initially going to be the sports fan. One subscription gets it all.
If they could just start over with all this combined bandwidth, plus the plans for hierarchical modulation, then we'd really be set.
Posted by: Jeff ? | February 20, 2007 6:02 PM
WOW! What a day!
Posted by: Manny | February 20, 2007 9:26 PM
How many shares Mel ?
Never has less been said, with more words.....
Hey Mel.... when you provide ( real ) details and results, we'll provide money ( stock purchases ) and subscriptions.
No more betting on the come ....
Done betting on back seat video and CFBE @ 4.5 !
Posted by: Plowboy1 | February 21, 2007 6:37 AM
What I'm more concerned with is if the FCC will impose any "indecency" clauses in the merger conditions, if they are to approve this. Kevin Martin is a big fan of "a la carte" offerings and I know it's been bantered about whether they will enforce such a condition to allow this deal to go through. I don't feel I should have to pay more or differently simply because some douche bag doesn't want his/her kid to hear the word 'shit'. Make those people pay more...why should I have to?
Posted by: Anonymous Coward | February 21, 2007 8:45 AM
Anonymous Coward: I'll turn that question around on you - why should the parent have to pay more than you? You're forcing your obscenity on others, and the majority of society at that.
Posted by: waterwagen ? | February 21, 2007 10:31 AM
waterwagen,
Obscenity is a subjective term, I'm sorry to say. Who's to say that the "majority of society" agrees with the parents? The whole point of satellite radio is uninterrupted, uncensored music and talk - that's what I pay for already. I don't want to pay MORE because of someone else's moral hangups.
If you don't want to hear it, turn it off or stop paying for it. There's plenty of non-censored music on terrestrial radio for you and your kids to listen to. Give me one good reason WHY those who already pay a premium should pay more because those with children are too lazy to figure out how to use parental controls?
Posted by: Anonymous Coward | February 21, 2007 4:49 PM
WE'RE ALL SCREWED... the game is OVER.. what will all this cost?? satellite radio.. they say the reason the merger will be approved is because of what the competition is.. both XM and sirius are both online as is online radio.. they both have the ability to record songs and say that i-pods are direct competition.. what is the reason for a merger?? cut the out of control spending... XM with Opra and sirius with Howard... and we the subscribers get the shaft as usual...
Posted by: steve | February 21, 2007 5:23 PM
who's sitting on this now? I'm ready to start making calls and sending emails to light a fire under their behinds! Is it the FCC? The Senate? House? C'mon, already.
SOmebody needs to defecate or get up from the toilet.
Posted by: qweiop | February 20, 2008 10:34 AM
who's sitting on this now? I'm ready to start making calls and sending emails to light a fire under their behinds! Is it the FCC? The Senate? House? C'mon, already.
SOmebody needs to defecate or get up from the toilet.
Posted by: qweiop | February 20, 2008 10:36 AM